Sydneysiders Against Polluting Stacks

August 2003

 

M5 EAST TUNNEL AIR QUALITY MONITORING REPORT – JULY 2003

Executive Summary of Health Report

NB Pollutants monitored in the course of the study were:

    • carbon monoxide (CO)
    • carbon dioxide (CO2)
    • nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
    • BTEX gases (eg benzine)
    • fine particulates (PM10 - PM2.5)
  1. All CO levels measured were “within WHO guidelines,” and
  2. “... were significantly lower when the cabin was closed.”
  3. There are “no appropriate guidelines for NO2 exposure” in contexts such as this. However, there is a need for “better understanding and management” of this in road tunnels.
  4. “Through the simple act of closing the vehicle cabin windows and switching the vehicle ventilation to recirculate” can be an effective precautionary measure to reduce the exposure to pollutants when using road tunnels.
Closed windows can reduce exposure:
    • to CO/NO2 by 70-73%
    • to particulates by 80%
    • to BTEX gases by 50%.

RTA Responses: “RTA welcomes the Health Report Findings... this latest study shows that the M5 East is meeting the guidelines set down for its operations.”

Health Department Response: “Normal transit times of 7-10 minutes did not expose motorists to high levels of pollutants...”

“Notwithstanding that one should avoid air pollutants when one can... particularly people with asthma and other respiratory sensitivities.”

Response to the Report by Doctor Ray Kearney, Associate Professor from the University of Sydney’s Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology...

Dr Kearney, who has been involved with supporting RAPS for a number of years, has also worked comprehensively with the Lane Cove tunnel group since its inception. Consequently, he thoroughly analysed the M5 East AQ Health Report summarised above, finding it lacked the “academic rigour” that traditionally characterises such scientific reports if they are to have any validity. He found the Report to be a ‘flawed’ document in many respects.

For example, he pointed out that the WHO Guidelines cited above apply only to one element, CO, and not to the toxic mixture of chemicals, particulates and gases monitored in the M5 East Tunnel. Moreover, the carcinogenic concoction that enters and is for some time retained in the cabins of vehicles passing through the tunnel (as well, presumably in the residential/commercial areas around its portals and single stack) for some time before it dissipates. This is particularly dangerous for those prone to asthma and with existing respiratory illnesses.

A full copy of Dr Kearney’s analysis of the Health Report is currently held by the UPC’s representative on the AQCCC, M. Clarence if you are interested in tapping into the fuller feedback session that was part of the SAPS meeting on the 19th of August.

Margaret Clarence

 

Home | Back | Top

© 2003 Gerald Ganglbauer, created 28 August 2003